Health and nutrition claims for foods in Australia and New Zealand – and how these differ from those in the EU/UK

11 November 2022 | Ka Yin Law, Regulatory Affairs Advisor

In Australia and New Zealand, nutrition content claims and health claims for foods are regulated by Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code – Standard 1.2.7 – Nutrition, health and related claims . Whilst such claims are voluntary, they must comply with the requirements laid down in Standard 1.2.7. Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code Schedule 4 (Nutrition, health and related claims) , Schedule 5 (Nutrient profiling scoring method) and Schedule 6 (Required elements of a systematic review) set out detailed information relating to the Standard.

Nutrition content claims in Australia and New Zealand

Nutrition content claims refer to the content of certain nutrients or substances in food. To use a nutrition content claim, the food must meet the criteria for the claim, as set out in Schedule 4 .

For example, a food with the claim ‘good source of dietary fibre’, must contain at least 4g of dietary fibre in a serving. For a nutrition content claim of ‘increased dietary fibre’, which is considered a comparative claim in Australia, the food must contain at least 2 g of dietary fibre per serving and at least 25% more dietary fibre than the same amount of the comparative reference food. A reference food is a food of the same type as the food for which the claim is made, without further processing.

Health claims in Australia and New Zealand

There are two types of health claims – ‘general’ and ‘high’ level. General level claims refer to effects on general health, whereas high level claims relate to specific diseases / conditions. Pre-approved high level health claims for food-health relationships are listed in Schedule 4 .

Health claims can only be made if they meet the Nutrient Profiling Scoring Criterion (NPSC) in Schedule 5 . All health claims must be supported by scientific evidence to the same degree of certainty, whether they are pre-approved by Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) or self-substantiated by food businesses by following the process for systematic review in Schedule 6 of the code.

Comparison to the EU/UK market

In the EU/UK, making nutrition and health claim is also voluntary and any food about which a claim is made must comply with the conditions set out for that claim, as laid down in regulation (EU) No 1924/2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods (retained EU legislation in UK).

Authorised claims in both regions use a scientific and evidence-based substantiation, however there are differences in the outputs as the populations they are intended for are different.

‘Source of vitamin/mineral’ claims for example are substantially different between Australian and EU/UK markets. In the EU/UK, at least 15% of the nutrient reference value (NRV) for the vitamin or mineral is required per 100g or 100ml. Whereas for Australia, at least 10% RDI (Recommended Daily Intake) or ESADDI (Estimated Safe and Adequate Daily Dietary Intake) of a single serving is the minimum requirement, along with the additional conditions for that particular vitamin or mineral.

Campden BRI can help you ensure that your products are compliant with the legislative requirements of your target market. Our experienced team of regulatory experts can advise on the legislation surrounding nutrition labelling, advise on the use of nutrition and health claims, and support the preparation of health claim dossiers.

How can we help you?

If you’d like to find out more about nutrition and health claims in Australia and New Zealand, contact our support team to find out how we can help.

Contact an expert

Are you a Campden BRI member who attends the MIG meetings?

- If not, you’re missing out on a whole host of exclusive benefits such as learning from industry-leading experts and networking with peers to overcome your challenges.

Member Interest Groups

More on Regulatory

Man and woman inspecting equipment at a food factory

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9: most common non-conformances

Our thoughts on the most common non-conformances raised since audits against Issue 9 began in February.

Range of high fat, salt and sugar foods

Promotional restrictions in the UK for products that are high in fat, sugar and salt (HFSS)

An open consultation for England was opened in December 2022 on the introduction of secondary HFSS legislation for the further advertising restrictions on TV...

Consumer reading food packaging label in supermarket

Allergen labelling

In EU legislation, there are 14 groups of food raw materials that must be labelled on food and drink packages if they have been deliberately included as an i...

Woman in supermarket reading food packaging and comparing two food products

Frequently answered questions about EU-harmonised and UK food law

Based on common enquiries received by our Regulatory Affairs team, we have compiled some key information on the provision of information on labels of prepack...

Woman reading dairy product label. Product pulled from supermarket fridge

Food allergen management and labelling – the food industry’s evolution

Helen Arrowsmith, Regulatory Affairs Manager and Allergen Specialist reflects on the industry’s evolution with respect to food allergen labelling and managem...

Close up shot of wheat growing in field with sunlight bursting through

Food allergen labelling – the difference between ‘gluten’ and ‘cereals containing gluten’

Helen Arrowsmith (Regulatory Affairs Manager and Allergen Specialist), Christopher James (Safety and Quality Specialist, Allergens) and Lewis Wallis (Regulat...

Contact an expert