BRCGS Packaging Issue 6: Key changes

Richard Leathers, Food Safety Management System Lead

BRC Global Standards has recently launched a new packaging standard (BRC Global Standard for Packaging and Packaging Materials Issue 6) with changes that bring it in line with Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) requirements, industry best practice and the BRC Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 8. In this video, Richard covers the changes that you may need to be aware of and how they may affect you.


Contact us

Before you Send please insert the same letters and numbers you see in this image captcha_image into this box: (this helps us fight spam)


When you click on the Send button you will be deemed to have accepted our terms and conditions

Richard Leathers

About Richard Leathers

Richard Leathers joined Campden BRI in September 2011, working in the areas of HACCP and Quality Management Systems.

Read more...

Transcript

We're here today to talk about Issue 6 of the BRCGS Packaging Standard. A lot of the changes that have happened to this standard bring it in-line with GFSI requirements, but also bring it in-line with some of the changes have happened in Issue 8 of the food standard. What the process for changing standards and updating the standards is we get a lot of packaging manufacturers but also retailers and independent experts that come together to update the standards.


One of the first big changes is to introduce culture into the standard clause 1.1.2. This is a read across from the both the GFSI and the food standard one important thing to note here for packaging manufacturers is that this clause is being deferred a year to allow packaging manufacturers to get used to it, so this will not be audited until the 1st of February 2021, whereas the rest of the standard is being audited from the 1st of February 2020.


One of the other new areas is in environmental monitoring. Now it's important to say here that this environmental monitoring clause is based on risk, and this may not be applicable to all packaging manufacturers. There is a BRCGS positioning statement on this number p558 so it's important to reference that or if companies want to get in touch with us, we can give them guidance and advice. It may not be applicable because if you're producing packaging that is not in contact with the product, then there's less risk than if there is. It also may be important to look at not necessarily pathogens but yeasts and molds.


Another area to be aware of is product defence - in the food standard this is food defence. Product defence is clause 4.4 and we have seen this is the 15th most populous non-conformance in the food standard so it is something to be aware of in in packaging as well. There's a number of changes in section two but one of the big focuses there is to move to the terminology of hazard and risk analysis (away from previous definitions). This allows a separation from quality and product safety in packaging so that they're both covered slightly differently. Linking into the product defence and product security that we spoke about is there's some new clauses again that read across from the food standard on digital protection and cyber security so in the packaging standard its Clause 3.2.2 and there's also other areas that need to be aware of within that.


One of the big areas of non-conformity in both the food standard and the packaging standard is within internal audits - this is section 5.2. Now there's a number of updates within this section so it's important for packaging manufacturers to look at those updates and make changes accordingly.


Some of the smaller but still significant changes within the packaging standard Issue 6 include updating overhead walkways where there is a risk so Clause 4.2.6. This is important to say where there is a risk so where there's open and exposed packaging there may need to be covers and controls. Some of the other areas here are on things like ‘whistle blowing’, glass controls and sharp controls as well.


One of the big new areas and sections is on corrective and preventive actions - section 3.6. This is not only new but it's also a new fundamental clause within the packaging standard. A new a fundamental clause is quite key because if a packaging site gains a major non-conformance against a fundamental clause, that has serious repercussions. Finally, within the packaging standard Issue 6, there are two new voluntary modules: the first one is on traded goods which again ties in with the food standard but the second one is a voluntary module based on plastics and it's for pellet flake and powder control again it's a voluntary module.

More on Food safety management systems

Cooking oil being inspected by woman in protective clothing and hair net with electronic tablet

Agility for overcoming supply chain disruption

How to build resilience against supply chain challenges and threats, including the importance of having an agile and holistic food safety management system i...


Food ingredients being analysed for food fraud

Four ways to build supply chain resilience

Supply chain resilience enables businesses to protect themselves from negative impacts of supply chain threats, and thrive in an ever-changing environment. T...


Agriculture crops growing in indoor shelving racks

Supply chain assurance, traceability, and raw material risk assessments

The importance of supply chain assurance, traceability and raw material risk assessments for ensuring resilience against supply chain threats.


Pilot plant workers inspecting looking at tablet

Positive food safety culture and supply chain resilience

The importance and benefits of a positive food safety culture, including with particular reference to supply chain resilience.


Man and woman inspecting equipment at a food factory

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9: most common non-conformances

Our thoughts on the most common non-conformances raised since audits against Issue 9 began in February.


Selection of common foods related to allergies

Asking our network about their food allergen cross-contact concerns

We asked our LinkedIn network for feedback on allergen cross-contact via a number of poll questions about their concerns in this area.



Contact an expert