Factory workers having a discussion on food factory floor

RCA in the food and drink industry: How to get root cause analysis right

11 May 2026 | Louise Harris, Safety and Quality Specialist, and Richard Leathers, Global Quality Lead

Finding and addressing the true root cause of a food or drink non-conformance incident is incredibly important to prevent reoccurrence, but can be challenging to achieve in practice.

Ask an expert - your questions, direct to our experts

Before you click Submit, please insert the same letters and numbers you see in this image captcha_image into this box:

When you click on the Submit button you will be deemed to have accepted our terms and conditions.

To complete root cause analysis (RCA) studies thoroughly there are various steps that need to be considered. If any part of the investigation is missed, the correction, prevention and continuous improvement you are trying to deliver can fall down.

RCA challenges

There are many challenges with completing thorough root cause analysis investigations, for example:

  • Are you getting to the true causes, not just addressing symptoms of issues found?
  • Do you complete investigations in a timely manner and with a suitable competent team of individuals with the right skills and knowledge?
  • Is the investigation well documented outlining the RCA tools used?
  • Are you ensuring there is shared learning in other areas of the business or with sister sites (for multi-site operations) when the outcomes of the investigation are addressed?
  • Is adequate time and resource being dedicated to incident investigations – in particular, root cause analysis?

How to overcome RCA challenges

To ensure a robust and effective investigation, it essential to use the appropriate tools – for example, using ‘PEMPEM’ followed by ‘Five Whys’. We explain more in this section.

Finding the cause:

Once the scope of the RCA study has been determined, we need to dive into ‘thought showering’ what could have caused the issue. Many tools are available to help you do this – whether it’s; Fishbone / Ishikawa / PEMPEM (diagram below), Five Why’s, BowTie, Mindmap etc.

PEMPEM diagram

Using a PEMPEM diagram to document, expand and rationalise your thought showering can help ensure that all possible causes are captured. It also then aids identification of which potential causes are the most likely and significant.

From a tool such as PEMPEM, you then need to take what you believe to be the key / critical causes and analyse them further. For this, a tool such as ‘five whys’ can help you to understand the underlying causal factors behind the superficial issue.

Five whys diagram

By asking “why” of the ‘cause’, you can then continue this stepwise until you get to the true root cause. It is important to expand the ‘five’ concept for as many steps as it takes to reach the true root of the issue.

Implementing and verifying the solution:

Once the cause(s) have been established, it is important to identify what you are going to put in place as corrective and preventative measures. It is not until these measures have been implemented and verified as working that we can ask the question of whether the solution is effective.

Checking the effectiveness of solutions can be an area that is missed on the close out of RCA investigations, due to tight timelines and using RCA as a tick box exercise (for satisfying customer or auditor requirements) rather than a true continuous improvement tool.

Effective RCA fits into a wider framework of improving food safety, quality, culture and operational excellence.

We link RCA to our corrective action or continuous improvement loop (see graphic below) for closing out non-conformances / non-conformance notes (NCNs).

Continuous improvement loop diagram

This keeps a focus on ensuring a true, effective, verified solution (based on a full understanding of the cause), rather than only a quick fix.

How we can help – true root cause, verified solutions, continuous improvement

We have a history of supporting our members, clients and the wider industry in this difficult area.

Download our FREE Supply Chain Resilience eBook today! Thrive in a changing environment by being prepared, agile and resilient.

Promotional material

We can assist with RCA including:

  • RCA training and awareness for your team – tutor led (online or in person) or E-learning modules
  • Risk management support
  • Correction and corrective action review
  • Crisis management advice during an incident
  • Support following issues or incidents from an independent perspective

Our experts can help you to find the true root cause and determine the right corrective and preventive actions to ensure that you have cost effective solutions in place, and enable continuous improvement.

If you need guidance or support with RCA investigations, please get in touch.

About Richard Leathers

Richard Leathers joined Campden BRI in September 2011, and has worked in the food industry for 4 decades.

Richard started working with Dairy Crest and subsequently worked for both Heinz, Unilever, Best Foods and Kanes Foods. Working in the areas of HACCP and Quality Management Systems, Richard also has experience within the fresh produce sector, as well as analysis systems in the milling / baking areas, and is a BRCGS qualified lead auditor.

Richard has contributed to several publications and guidelines, including those for TACCP, VACCP and HACCP / Risk Evaluation and is also trained at advanced level by EHEDG (European Hygienic Engineering Design Group).

Read more...

How can we help?

If your investigation could benefit from our RCA guidance and practical support, get in touch

Contact us

Campden BRI Membership

Discover more about how you can benefit from a Campden BRI membership

Member benefits

More on Food safety management systems

Technician checking food product during manufacturing process

HACCP: Six key elements of an effective HACCP system

HACCP systems protect food businesses but can also fail them if not correctly implemented. Here we go through 6 key areas of ensuring a robust and effective ...


Factory worker performing factory audit with electronic tablet

Avoiding common hygiene non-conformances in food manufacturing: Top tips for internal hygiene audits

To successfully embed hygiene into manufacturing environments, we need to shift our mindset and ask: “Where in our facility is contamination most likely to o...


Biscuits on a production line

Why recipe changeovers remain high risk for allergen management – and how to control them

Changeover allergen management failures continue to feature heavily in audits and root cause analyses. The challenge is rarely about one thing – it’s a combi...


Person turning dial on an oven in kitchen

Oven cooking instruction development: Why do we need to use three ovens?

Greg Hooper covers how different oven types work and what this (along with other considerations) means for how heat transfers to products


Baby formula being scooped out of tin

More than just testing: A layered approach to risk management for Bacillus cereus cereulide toxin

The recent recalls serve as a reminder that food safety is not just a technical requirement, but a commitment to protecting the most vulnerable consumers.


Factory worker performing factory audit with electronic tablet

Top BRGCS and FSSC non-conformances – what can we learn?

Here we cover the key themes and focus areas that may be drawn from recent global non-conformance data of FSSC 22000 and BRCGS audits.